Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1009
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamalingam, Jothi-
dc.contributor.otherMartin, D.M.-
dc.contributor.otherGalvez, V.-
dc.contributor.otherLauf, S.-
dc.contributor.otherDong, V.-
dc.contributor.otherBaily, S.A.-
dc.contributor.otherCordoner, N.-
dc.contributor.otherChan, H.N.-
dc.contributor.otherDavidson, D.-
dc.contributor.otherFam, J.-
dc.contributor.otherDe Felice, N.-
dc.contributor.otherMartinez-Amoros, E.-
dc.contributor.otherMohan, T.-
dc.contributor.otherSarma, S.I.-
dc.contributor.otherTor, P.C.-
dc.contributor.otherWaite, S.-
dc.contributor.otherLoo, C.K.-
dc.date2017-06-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-30T01:56:22Zen
dc.date.available2017-08-30T01:56:22Zen
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citation34(1):7-13en
dc.identifier.issn1095-0680en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1009en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: There is currently substantial heterogeneity in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment methods between clinical settings. Understanding how this variation in clinical practice is related to treatment outcomes is essential for optimizing service delivery. The Clinical Alliance and Research in ECT Network is a clinical and research framework with the aims of improving clinical practice, enabling auditing and benchmarking, and facilitating the collection of naturalistic clinical data. METHODS: The network framework and clinical and treatment variables collected and rationale for the use of particular outcome measures are described. Survey results detailing the use of ECT across initial participating clinical centers were examined. RESULTS: The data are reported from 18 of 22 participating centers, the majority based in Australia. Melancholic unipolar depression was the most common clinical indication (78%). Right unilateral (44%) and bifrontal (39%) were the most commonly used electrode placements. Eighty one percent of the centers used individual seizure titration for initial dosing. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity in the use of ECT between participating centers, indicating that the Network is representative of modern ECT practice. The Clinical Alliance and Research in ECT Network may therefore offer the opportunity to improve service delivery and facilitate the investigation of unresolved research questions pertaining to modern ECT practice.en
dc.description.sponsorshipMental Healthen
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychiatryen
dc.subjectMental Healthen
dc.titleThe Clinical Alliance and Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy Network: An Australian initiative for improving service delivery of electroconvulsive therapyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/YCT.0000000000000435en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658011en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of ECTen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Mental Health
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

126
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.