Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMay, Austin N-
dc.contributor.authorKull, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorGunalingam, Brendan B-
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, J Lynn-
dc.contributor.authorLau, George T-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T03:13:52Zen
dc.date.available2017-09-29T03:13:52Zen
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.citation205(3):127en
dc.identifier.issn0025-729xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1024en
dc.description.abstractThe use of coronary pressure wires (or fractional flow reserve [FFR]) has been shown to reduce the frequency of major adverse cardiac events and of unnecessary stent procedures, and to lower treatment costs in both the public and private sectors in Australia.1,2,3 FFR is a tool for assessing physiological ischaemia in coronary artery stenosis, measuring pre- and post-stenosis pressures during adenosine-induced hyperaemia. Because it is evidence-based and quantifiable, it may be discussed during the upcoming Medicare reform. Data on its uptake across Australia, however, have not been published.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCardiologyen
dc.subjectCardiologyen
dc.titleThe uptake of coronary fractional flow reserve in Australia in the past decadeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465768en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleMedical Journal of Australiaen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Cardiology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Jul 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.