Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1250
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBack, Michael-
dc.contributor.otherOh, B.-
dc.contributor.otherLee, K.J.-
dc.contributor.otherZaslawski, C.-
dc.contributor.otherYeung, A.-
dc.contributor.otherRosenthal, D.-
dc.contributor.otherLarkey, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-11T01:23:42Zen
dc.date.available2019-01-11T01:23:42Zen
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.citation22(1):71en
dc.identifier.issn1342-078xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1250en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported that spending time in nature is associated with the improvement of various health outcomes and well-being. This review evaluated the physical and psychological benefits of a specific type of exposure to nature, forest therapy. METHOD: A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and ProQuest databases and manual searches from inception up to December 2016. Key words: "Forest" or "Shinrin -Yoku" or "Forest bath" AND "Health" or "Wellbeing". The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. RESULTS: Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Participants' ages ranged from 20 to 79 years. Sample size ranged from 18 to 99. Populations studied varied from young healthy university students to elderly people with chronic disease. Studies reported the positive impact of forest therapy on hypertension (n = 2), cardiac and pulmonary function (n = 1), immune function (n = 2), inflammation (n = 3), oxidative stress (n = 1), stress (n = 1), stress hormone (n = 1), anxiety (n = 1), depression (n = 2), and emotional response (n = 3). The quality of all studies included in this review had a high ROB. CONCLUSION: Forest therapy may play an important role in health promotion and disease prevention. However, the lack of high-quality studies limits the strength of results, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish clinical practice guidelines for its use. More robust RCTs are warranted.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCentral Coast Cancer Centreen
dc.description.sponsorshipRadiation Oncologyen
dc.subjectComplementary Therapiesen
dc.subjectRadiologyen
dc.titleHealth and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29165173en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.description.affiliatesNorthern Sydney Central Coast Healthen
dc.identifier.journaltitleEnvironmental health and preventive medicineen
dc.type.studyortrialSystematic Reviewsen
dc.relation.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-8333en
dc.originaltypeTexten
dc.type.contentTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Radiology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

158
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.