Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForsyth, Cecily Jen
dc.contributor.otherFavaloro, E.J.en
dc.contributor.otherKoutts, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-24T03:01:19Zen
dc.date.available2019-01-24T03:01:19Zen
dc.date.issued2012-02en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 34, Issue 1, pp. 102 - 105en
dc.identifier.issn1751-5521en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1267en
dc.description.abstractDiscrimination of types 1 and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is problematic. Type 1 VWD represents a quantitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor and type 2M a qualitative disorder. 2M VWD is considered a potentially more serious bleeding disorder than type 1 VWD and may also require a differential management approach given the higher bleeding risk and that desmopressin may be less effective. We describe a case of 2M VWD 'masquerading' as type 1 and show how the differential diagnosis can be obtained using standard laboratory assays. The case was genetically confirmed as a 3943C>T mutation, leading to R1315C.en
dc.subjectHaematologyen
dc.subjectHematologyen
dc.titleDistinguishing types 1 and 2M von Willebrand diseaseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1751-553X.2011.01362.xen
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794096en
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Laboratory Hematologyen
dc.relation.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9108-3088en
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptHaematology-
Appears in Collections:Haematology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.