Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCalopedos, Ross J S-
dc.contributor.authorRuthven, Stephen-
dc.contributor.otherBang, A.-
dc.contributor.otherBaade, P.D.-
dc.contributor.otherYu, X.Q.-
dc.contributor.otherPatel, M.I.-
dc.contributor.otherSmith, D.P.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T00:46:19Zen
dc.date.available2019-06-18T00:46:19Zen
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citation27(3):216-223en
dc.identifier.issn1038-5282en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1478en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Describes the variation in prostate cancer testing by the remoteness of residence and socio-economic status groups in Australia. DESIGN: A national population-based descriptive study using Medicare data extracted by the Department of Health (formerly the Department of Health and Ageing). SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All men, with a Medicare-reimbursed prostate-specific antigen test conducted in Australia between 2002 and 2017, were included. We focused on "screening and case finding" tests (Medicare Benefits Schedule item number 66655) from 1 April 2005 to 31 December 2009, to describe testing differences in subgroups. Groups were categorised into State and Territory, socio-economic status and region of residence. A negative binomial regression model was fitted to measure the incidence rate ratios of those who had a screening prostate-specific antigen test by group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised testing rates and incidence rate ratios. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 11 588 775 screening prostate-specific antigen tests were reimbursed by the Department of Human Services. During 2005-2009, 52% of all Australian men, aged 40 years and over, had a screening test. The incidence rate ratios differed by State and Territory. Men aged 40 years and over, living in very remote areas, were 43% less likely to have had a screening test than residents of major cities. Prostate-specific antigen testing rates fell in all age groups between 2007 and 2009 and 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The prostate-specific antigen testing behaviour differs between community groups in Australia. Men were less likely to have had a screening prostate-specific antigen test the farther they lived from the major cities. This highlights the need for a more targeted approach to achieve an equitable and evidence-based prostate cancer care across all sectors of the community.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCentral Coast Cancer Centreen
dc.description.sponsorshipUrologyen
dc.titlePatterns of prostate-specific antigen testing by remoteness of residence and socio-economic status: An Australian population-based studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajr.12504en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070837en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Australian Journal of Rural Healthen
dc.relation.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0074-0001en
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.