Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1900
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMackay, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherBalogh, Z.-
dc.contributor.otherKing, K.L.-
dc.contributor.otherMcDougall, D.-
dc.contributor.otherMacKenzie, S.-
dc.contributor.otherEvans, J.A.-
dc.contributor.otherLyons, T.-
dc.contributor.otherDeane, S.A.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-07T23:13:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-07T23:13:22Z-
dc.date.issued2007-11-
dc.identifier.citationVolume 63, Issue 5, pp. 1066 - 1073en
dc.identifier.issn0022-5282en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1900-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The severity of pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) can range from minor injury with low-energy mechanism to high-energy injury causing prehospital death. The purpose of this study was to prospectively describe the comprehensive pelvic fracture occurrence in an inclusive trauma system. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, population-based epidemiologic study was performed in the Hunter Region, New South Wales, Australia (population of 600,000, served by one Level I trauma center and 7 referring hospitals). Patient demographics, mechanism, injury severity, shock parameters, and outcomes were recorded prospectively. The database included all pelvic fractures from the region: high-energy pelvic fractures (HE-PRFs), low-energy pelvic fractures (LE-PRFs), and prehospital deaths (PD-PRFs). RESULTS: The incidence of PRF in the trauma system was 23 per 100,000 persons (138 fractures). The incidences of HE-PRF and LE-PRF were each 10 per 100,000 persons, whereas there were 3 PD-PRFs per 100,000. HE-PRF compared with LE-PRF occurred predominantly in men (64% vs. 20%, p < 0.05), younger persons (41 +/- 3 vs. 83 +/- 1 years, p < 0.05), those who had a higher Injury Severity Score (23 +/- 3 vs. 6 +/- 1, p < 0.05), and those with lower blood pressure (111 +/- 1 mm Hg vs. 153 +/- 1 mm Hg, p < 0.05), but the inhospital mortality rate was not statistically different (15% vs. 8%, p = NS). The overall mortality of the cohort was 23% (60% of those were from the PD-PRF group). The PRF-related mortality was 7% (HE-PRF: 7%; LE-PRF: 2%; PD-PRF: 33%), which was always attributable to bleeding. The incidence of demonstrated pelvic fracture-related arterial bleeding was 1.3 per 100,000 persons per year. CONCLUSIONS: LE-PRF and HE-PRF are equally frequent among hospital admissions. They represent two distinct demographic groups with similar mortality rate. Most PRF-related deaths occur prehospitally. Bleeding remains the primary cause of PRF-related mortality in all groups.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNursing & Midwifery Directorateen
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectNewborn and Infanten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.titleThe epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17993952/en
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of Traumaen
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Cohort Studyen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.