Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1/191
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Garrett, Tim | en |
dc.contributor.author | Harbort, Yvonne | en |
dc.contributor.author | Trebble, Mary | en |
dc.contributor.author | Docherty, Toni | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-07T01:24:12Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-07T01:24:12Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2012-08 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Volume 24, Issue 4, pp. 383-392 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1441-0737 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/191 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Cellulitis is a common presentation to the ED and a significant cause of hospitalization that can be managed in hospital-in-the-home programmes. Current clinical-practice guidelines recommend once or twice-daily i.v. antibiotics; however, there is an absence of data describing the impact of these guidelines in real-world practice-based settings. This study aims to describe the safety and effectiveness of home-based cellulitis treatment according to an online treatment algorithm. Methods: Over 12 months, 301 patients with a diagnosis of uncomplicated cellulitis requiring i.v. antibiotics and eligible for home-based therapy completed once-daily (cephazolin plus probenecid) or twice-daily (cephazolin alone) treatment, according to the treatment algo- rithm. Time (days) until non-progression of cellulitis was the primary outcome measure. Length of stay and treatment-related side-effects were also recorded. Results: The mean time until non-progression was 2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98–2.23) days versus 2.13 (95% CI 1.81–2.45) days for the once-daily (n = 213) and twice-daily (n = 88) regimens, respectively (P = 0.92, difference in means 0.02 [95% CI -0.36–0.33]). The corresponding mean length of stay was 6.55 (95% CI 5.96–7.15) days versus 7.67 (95% CI 6.69–8.65) days (P = 0.06, difference in means 1.12 [CI 0.03–1.23]). Treatment-related side-effects were reported in 15.5% (33/213 [95% CI 10.6–20.3]) of patients receiving the once-daily regimen compared with 9.1% (8/88 [95% CI 3.1–15.1]) treated twice-daily. Application of the once-daily strategy increased hospital-in-the-home cellulitis-related treatment capacity by 52% (1396/2688 [95% CI 50–54]). Conclusions: An online decision support algorithm can support the effective use of a once or twice-daily treatment regimen for uncomplicated cellulitis. This approach can increase the efficiency and capacity of home-based therapy, resulting in better alignment of treatment options with clinicians and patients’ preferences. | en |
dc.subject | Drug Therapy | en |
dc.subject | Community Health Nursing | en |
dc.subject | Immunology | en |
dc.subject | Cellulitis | en |
dc.title | Once or Twice-Daily, Algorithm-Based Intravenous Cephazolin for Home-Based Cellulitis Treatment | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2012.01553.x | en |
dc.description.pubmeduri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22862755 | en |
dc.description.affiliates | Central Coast Local Health District | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Emergency Medicine Australasia | en |
dc.originaltype | Text | en |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | Nursing |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.