Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2330
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMak, J N-
dc.contributor.authorImran, A-
dc.contributor.authorBurnet, S-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T03:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-29T03:48:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-
dc.identifier.citation23(4):350-354en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1/2330-
dc.description.abstractHysteroscopy and anesthesia have come a long way in the last 150 years. While traditionally performed in the operating theater under general anesthesia, the alternative approach - so-called 'office' hysteroscopy - has gained popularity in recent years. Supporters of this modality cite the 'see and treat' capabilities, avoidance of anesthesia, more rapid turn-around time, and favorable economics as advantages. On the other hand, some question the success rate, capabilities, and patient comfort levels as potential drawbacks. In this article, we review the evidence behind all of these points as well as the requirements for setting up an office hysteroscopy service.en
dc.description.sponsorshipObstetrics & Gynaecologyen
dc.subjectGynaecologyen
dc.subjectGynecologyen
dc.titleOffice hysteroscopy: back to the future!en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13697137.2020.1750589en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32319835en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.identifier.journaltitleClimactericen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptObstetrics & Gynaecology-
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics / Paediatrics
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

82
checked on Nov 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.