Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2344
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIlievski, Vasko-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Tomiko-
dc.contributor.authorLawson, William-
dc.contributor.authorHoyland, Shane-
dc.contributor.authorTran, Kelvin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T04:56:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-31T04:56:50Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.citation12(1):e002034en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1/2344-
dc.description.abstractPatients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient's behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched.The aims of this project were to describe the characteristics of patients receiving a C-ART call and the experiences of C-ART staff members via semistructured interviews. Additionally, to audit local practice against two established standards of practice (Local C-ART Call Guideline and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guideline), to develop interventions to address identified shortfalls in adherence to these standards of practice and finally to re-evaluate adherence postintervention. A retrospective pre and postintervention audit using qualitative (interview) and quantitative (file review) mixed method research approach was used. Interventions targeted doctor hospital orientation sessions, distribution of hospital guidelines including a new pharmacological sedation guideline and finally ward-based brief education sessions. Themes identified postintervention included improved familiarity with C-ART terminology, better understanding of C-ART member roles and improved communication among medical teams. However, there was continued pressure to use pharmacological sedation, a lack of debriefing and poor patient handover.File review of patients postintervention showed improvement from 36.8% to 65.6% in recording a provisional diagnosis and differentials for a patient behaviour necessitating a C-ART call. Additionally, the use of psychotropics during C-ART calls was lowered by 3.3% but did not reach significance (p=0.62). Behavioural disturbances in the elderly present many challenges for health staff. Interactive orientation sessions for doctors and distribution of hospital guidelines were shown to improve compliance with Local C-ART Call and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guidelines. Patients who receive multiple C-ART calls require further exploration and consideration, as this subset of the patient population present unique challenges.en
dc.description.sponsorshipRehabilitation & Aged Careen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectMental Healthen
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.titleCognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital settingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002034en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36958790en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesWyong Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Open Qualityen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

142
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.