Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Rhonda L-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Oliver-
dc.contributor.authorAtem, Jacob-
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, Andrea E-
dc.contributor.authorGildberg, Frederik Alkier-
dc.contributor.authorHooper, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorHopwood, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorRosado, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Bernadette-
dc.contributor.authorWard, Katrina-
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Brandi-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T02:29:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-19T02:29:45Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-
dc.identifier.citation32(3):938-944en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1/2366-
dc.description.abstractThere has been an international surge towards online, digital, and telehealth mental health services, further amplified during COVID-19. Implementation and integration of technological innovations, including artificial intelligence (AI), have increased with the intention to improve clinical, governance, and administrative decision-making. Mental health nurses (MHN) should consider the ramifications of these changes and reflect on their engagement with AI. It is time for mental health nurses to demonstrate leadership in the AI mental health discourse and to meaningfully advocate that safety and inclusion of end users' of mental health service interests are prioritized. To date, very little literature exists about this topic, revealing limited engagement by MHNs overall. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of AI in the mental health context and to stimulate discussion about the rapidity and trustworthiness of AI related to the MHN profession. Despite the pace of progress, and personal life experiences with AI, a lack of MHN leadership about AI exists. MHNs have a professional obligation to advocate for access and equity in health service distribution and provision, and this applies to digital and physical domains. Trustworthiness of AI supports access and equity, and for this reason, it is of concern to MHNs. MHN advocacy and leadership are required to ensure that misogynist, racist, discriminatory biases are not favoured in the development of decisional support systems and training sets that strengthens AI algorithms. The absence of MHNs in designing technological innovation is a risk related to the adequacy of the generation of services that are beneficial for vulnerable people such as tailored, precise, and streamlined mental healthcare provision. AI developers are interested to focus on person-like solutions; however, collaborations with MHNs are required to ensure a person-centred approach for future mental healthcare is not overlooked.en
dc.description.sponsorshipMental Healthen
dc.subjectMental Healthen
dc.subjectNursingen
dc.titleArtificial intelligence: An eye cast towards the mental health nursing horizonen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/inm.13121en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36715172en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursingen
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptMental Health-
Appears in Collections:Mental Health
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

124
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.