Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/248
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoger, Simon Den
dc.contributor.authorLocatelli, Francescoen
dc.contributor.authorWoitas, Raineren
dc.contributor.authorLaville, Mauriceen
dc.contributor.authorTobe, Sheldonen
dc.contributor.authorProvenzano, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorGolper, Thomasen
dc.contributor.authorRuangkanchanasetr, Prajejen
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ho Yungen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Kwan-Dunen
dc.contributor.authorLadanyi, Agnesen
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Castelao, Albertoen
dc.contributor.authorUlrich, Beyeren
dc.contributor.authorDougherty, Franken
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-27T23:58:35Zen
dc.date.available2015-04-27T23:58:35Zen
dc.date.issued2011-04en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 26, Issue 12, pp. 3980-3986en
dc.identifier.issn0931-0509en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/248en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: No previous randomized controlled studies have been reported examining de novo, once every 4 weeks (Q4W) administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We report results from a randomized multinational study that compared continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) Q4W with darbepoetin alfa once weekly (QW) or every 2 weeks (Q2W) for the correction of anaemia in non-dialysis CKD patients. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 1.2 ug/kg C.E.R.A. Q4W or darbepoetin alfa QW/Q2W during a 20-week correction period and an 8-week evaluation period. Two primary end points were assessed: the haemoglobin (Hb) response rate and the change in average Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation. RESULTS: The Hb response rate for C.E.R.A. was 94.1%, significantly higher than the protocol-specified 60% response rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.1, 97.3; P < 0.0001] and comparable with darbepoetin alfa (93.5%; 95% CI: 88.4, 96.8; P < 0.0001). C.E.R.A. Q4W was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa QW/Q2W, with similar mean Hb changes from baseline of 1.62 g/dL and 1.66 g/dL, respectively. Patients receiving C.E.R.A. showed a steady rise in Hb, with fewer patients above the target range during the first 8 weeks compared with darbepoetin alfa [39 patients (25.8%) versus 72 patients (47.7%); P < 0.0001]. Adverse event rates were comparable between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: C.E.R.A. Q4W successfully corrects anaemia and maintains stable Hb levels within the recommended target range in non-dialysis CKD patients.en
dc.subjectKidney Diseaseen
dc.subjectAnaemiaen
dc.subjectAnemiaen
dc.subjectDrug Therapyen
dc.subjectDialysisen
dc.titleC.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks corrects Anaemia and maintains haemoglobin in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysisen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ndt/gfr160en
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21505096en
dc.identifier.journaltitleNephrology Dialysis Transplantationen
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Renal Medicine
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.