Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2674
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFellner, Avi-
dc.contributor.authorWali, Gurusidheshwar M-
dc.contributor.authorMahant, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorGrosz, Bianca R-
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Melina-
dc.contributor.authorNarayanan, Ramesh K-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Ryan L-
dc.contributor.authorTchan, Michel C-
dc.contributor.authorKotschet, Katya-
dc.contributor.authorYeow, Dennis-
dc.contributor.authorRudaks, Laura I-
dc.contributor.authorSiow, Sue-Faye-
dc.contributor.authorWali, Gautam-
dc.contributor.authorYiannikas, Con-
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorCopty, Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorGeaghan, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorDarveniza, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Laura J-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Florence C F-
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Briceño, Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorTisch, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorWhyte, Scott-
dc.contributor.authorKummerfeld, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorKennerson, Marina L-
dc.contributor.authorCowley, Mark J-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Victor S C-
dc.contributor.authorSue, Carolyn M-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Kishore R-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T05:51:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-04T05:51:50Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.citation124, 107010en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1/2674-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the contribution of genomic data reanalysis to the diagnostic yield of dystonia patients who remained undiagnosed after prior genome sequencing. Probands with heterogeneous dystonia phenotypes who underwent initial genome sequencing (GS) analysis in 2019 were included in the reanalysis, which was performed through gene-specific discovery collaborations and systematic genomic data reanalysis. Initial GS analysis in 2019 (n = 111) identified a molecular diagnosis in 11.7 % (13/111) of cases. Reanalysis between 2020 and 2023 increased the diagnostic yield by 7.2 % (8/111); 3.6 % (4/111) through focused gene-specific clinical correlation collaborative efforts [VPS16 (two probands), AOPEP and POLG], and 3.6 % (4/111) by systematic reanalysis completed in 2023 [NUS1 (two probands) and DDX3X variants, and a microdeletion encompassing VPS16]. Seven of these patients had a high phenotype-based dystonia score ≥3. Notable unverified findings in four additional cases included suspicious variants of uncertain significance in FBXL4 and EIF2AK2, and potential phenotypic expansion associated with SLC2A1 and TREX1 variants. GS data reanalysis increased the diagnostic yield from 11.7 % to 18.9 %, with potential extension up to 22.5 %. While optimal timing for diagnostic reanalysis remains to be determined, this study demonstrates that periodic re-interrogation of dystonia GS datasets can provide additional genetic diagnoses, which may have significant implications for patients and their families.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNeurologyen
dc.subjectNeurologyen
dc.titleGenome sequencing reanalysis increases the diagnostic yield in dystoniaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107010en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38772265en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.type.contentTexten
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Neurology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.