Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2823
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dorzi, Hasan M-
dc.contributor.authorArishi, Hatim-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hameed, Fahad M-
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Karen E A-
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Sangeeta-
dc.contributor.authorJose, Jesna-
dc.contributor.authorAlsolamy, Sami J-
dc.contributor.authorAbdukahil, Sheryl Ann I-
dc.contributor.authorAfesh, Lara Y-
dc.contributor.authorAlshahrani, Mohammed S-
dc.contributor.authorMandourah, Yasser-
dc.contributor.authorAlmekhlafi, Ghaleb A-
dc.contributor.authorAlmaani, Mohammed-
dc.contributor.authorAl Bshabshe, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorFinfer, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorArshad, Zia-
dc.contributor.authorKhalid, Imran-
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Yatin-
dc.contributor.authorGaur, Atul-
dc.contributor.authorHawa, Hassan-
dc.contributor.authorBuscher, Hergen-
dc.contributor.authorLababidi, Hani-
dc.contributor.authorAl Aithan, Abdulsalam-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dawood, Abdulaziz-
dc.contributor.authorArabi, Yaseen M-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T04:19:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-19T04:19:40Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-
dc.identifier.citation167(2):598-610en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1/2823-
dc.description.abstractThe diagnostic performance of the available risk assessment models for VTE in patients who are critically ill receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is unclear. For patients who are critically ill receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, do risk assessment models predict who would develop VTE or who could benefit from adjunctive pneumatic compression for thromboprophylaxis? In this post hoc analysis of the Pneumatic Compression for Preventing VTE (PREVENT) trial, different risk assessment models for VTE (ICU-VTE, Kucher, Intermountain, Caprini, Padua, and International Medical Prevention Registry on VTE [IMPROVE] models) were evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed evaluating the effect of adjunctive pneumatic compression vs none on the study primary outcome. Among 2,003 patients receiving pharen
dc.description.sponsorshipIntensive Careen
dc.subjectIntensive Careen
dc.subjectDrug Therapyen
dc.titlePerformance of Risk Assessment Models for VTE in Patients Who Are Critically Ill Receiving Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Pneumatic Compression for Preventing VTE Trialen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.182en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39232999en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleChesten
dc.type.contentTexten
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Apr 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.